• Home
• dual closure
• Dual ProGlide versus ProGlide and FemoSeal for vascular access haemostasis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Dual ProGlide versus ProGlide and FemoSeal for vascular access haemostasis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

5 (158) · $ 26.50 · In stock

This study compared outcomes of 874 patients who received either two ProGlide devices or one ProGlide plus one FemoSeal for vascular closure after transfemoral TAVI, finding reduced complications with the combination approach.

Frontiers A 20-year journey in transcatheter aortic valve

PDF) A 20-year journey in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Evolution to current eminence

Propensity-matched comparison of percutaneous and surgical cut-down approaches in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation using a balloon-expandable valve

Current Access and Closure Options for TAVR Patients

Vascular access and closure in coronary angiography and

Alternative Access for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Procedural and in-hospital outcomes stratified by Perclose±Angio-Seal.

Large-bore Vascular Closure: New Devices and Techniques

/files/Articles/971762/fcvm-09

An upfront combined strategy for endovascular haemostasis in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation

A new Percutaneous technique for effective vascular Access Site closure in patients undergoing Transfemoral aortic valve implantation and thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm rEpair: the PASTE study

Comparison of a Single Versus Double Perclose Technique for

Alberto P. on LinkedIn: Dual ProGlide versus ProGlide and FemoSeal for vascular access haemostasis…

Stephan Heo, MD (@StephanHeo) / X